BMW M3 Coupe (E30)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5vsAlfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo SZ
3.0 V6 Zagato
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,200 kg2,646 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,200kg2,646lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 795km494mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,467cc151cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,345mm171in | 4,060mm160in |
| Width | 1,680mm66in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,565mm101in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,424mm56in | - |
| Rear track | 1,445mm57in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 68L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 238 hp 177 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 210 hp 157 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5 has 28 hp more than Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato and BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 6.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5 and Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.5 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5 | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 795 km 494 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 68 L 2.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.5
- Has 28 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 352 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato
- Has 5 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























