Alfa Romeo SZ
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 ZagatovsBMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E30)
2.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,200 kg2,646 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t137 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,260kg2,778lb | 1,200kg2,646lb |
| Gross weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 79.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 875km544mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,302cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,060mm160in | 4,345mm171in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,680mm66in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,424mm56in |
| Rear track | - | 1,445mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 68L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 6,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 210 hp 157 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato and BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 7.0 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3 and Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato | BMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 875 km 544 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 68 L 2.4 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo SZ 3.0 V6 Zagato
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Coupe (E30) 2.3
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 352 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























