Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,234 km767 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,604kg3,536lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 78.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 47.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 1,234km767mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 47.8 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,234 km 767 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 1,234 km 767 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 184 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 425 km (264 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























