Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,234 km767 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,604kg3,536lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 47.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,234km767mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 47.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 7.6 s |
Although Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,234 km 767 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,234 km 767 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 139 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























