Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 250

211 hp1991 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2019
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2d

210 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,208 km
    751 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
211hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,385kg3,053lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
69.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.7s
Calculated
36.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
1,208km751mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,424mm174in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,671mm66in
Wheelbase
2,699mm106in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,653mm65in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
421L
525L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
58L
CO2 emissions-
127g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2dPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2505,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.7 s
36.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
211 hp
157 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
210 hp
157 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 has 1 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
235 km/h
146 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
833 km
518 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,208 km
751 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
211 hp
157 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
210 hp
157 kW
6.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.6 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
211 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
1,208 km
751 mi
CO2 score
-
127 g/km
Trunk score
421 L
14.9 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 274 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 375 km (233 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 104 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d - car comparison - FastVsFaster