Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2d

210 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    127 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,208 km
    751 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
192hp143kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
76.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
69.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
34.3s
Calculated
36.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
773km480mi
Calculated
1,208km751mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,671mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,653mm65in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
525L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
58L
CO2 emissions
150g/km
127g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2dPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.3 s
36.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
210 hp
157 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d has 18 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.2 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
773 km
480 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,208 km
751 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
210 hp
157 kW
6.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.2 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
192 hp
143 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Range score
773 km
480 mi
1,208 km
751 mi
CO2 score
150 g/km
127 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 129 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 190 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 436 km (271 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.2d
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.2d
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.2d
GLA 250
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.2d
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsAUDIQ22.0 TFSI
2.2d
S 3.0 Diesel V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d - car comparison - FastVsFaster