Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
- Best estimated range951 km591 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Lightest1,706 kg3,761 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,706kg3,761lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 90.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.8s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 951km591mi Calculated | 783km486mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 460L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.8 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 951 km 591 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 783 km 486 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 951 km 591 mi | 783 km 486 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Is 39 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























