Lynk & Co 01
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.6 L/100 km147.0 mpg US176.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,769kg3,900lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 78.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.0s Calculated | 48.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,477cc90cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,512mm178in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,734mm108in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.0 s | 48.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 7.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has more power, Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 |
| 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co011.5 T3 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 2.80 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 4.51 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 240 L63 US gal53 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 420.00 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 185 Nm more
- Is 109 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























