Lynk & Co 09
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.8 L/100 km84.0 mpg US100.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,786 km1,110 mi
- Best economy score99/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.8L/100 km84mpg US100.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,786km1,110mi Calculated | 719km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,042mm199in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,977mm78in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,674mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo has 26 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 5.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5.7 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo has more power, Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: 6.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 1,786 km 1,110 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 719 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 |
| 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co092.0TD T8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.8 L/100 km 84.0 mpg US 100.9 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,786 km 1,110 mi | 719 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.8 L/100 km84 mpg US100.9 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 4.90 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 7.89 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 420 L111 US gal92 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 735.00 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 09 2.0TD T8
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,067 km (663 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 640 kg lighter
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























