Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0 GME

200 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best estimated range
    790 km
    491 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
220hp164kW
200hp149kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
76.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
38.4s
Calculated
40.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km482mi
Calculated
790km491mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,693mm67in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,818mm111in
Trunk volume
463L
-
Max trunk volume
1,607L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
64L
CO2 emissions-
187g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GMEPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.4 s
40.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
200 hp
149 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME7.2 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
790 km
491 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
200 hp
149 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
220 hp
164 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Range score
775 km
482 mi
790 km
491 mi
CO2 score
-
187 g/km
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME

  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI380
380TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 GME
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
GT TSI380
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 GME
2.0d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
GT TSI380
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 GME
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
GT TSI380
2.0 B5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
2.0 GME
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
GT TSI380
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 GME
2.5
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
GT TSI380
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 GME
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GMEvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME - car comparison - FastVsFaster