Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 39.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,593mm102in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 39.9 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,078 km 670 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























