AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























