Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (939)
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Largest trunk253 L
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 105.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,393mm173in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,328mm52in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 253L |
| Max trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 262g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 23 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 262 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























