BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630ivsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,530mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 147L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i has 40 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 6.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6.8 s |
Although BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























