Car comparison

BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) · Facelift 2003 325CivsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) · Facelift 2003

325Ci

192 hp2494 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2003-2006
VS

Alfa Romeo Spider (916)

3.0 V6

192 hp2959 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci

  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best overall score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    43/100

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Highest torque
    260 Nm
    192 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    737 km
    458 mi
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325CiAlfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192hp143kW
192hp143kW
Torque
245Nm181lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
1,985kg4,376lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
109.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
91.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
37.2s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
149Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
656km408mi
Calculated
737km458mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,494cc152cu in
2,959cc181cu in
Length
4,488mm177in
4,285mm169in
Width
1,757mm69in
1,780mm70in
Height
1,372mm54in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,725mm107in
2,540mm100in
Front track
1,471mm58in
1,499mm59in
Rear track
1,483mm58in
1,497mm59in
Trunk volume
260L
110L
Max trunk volume
300L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
63L
70L
CO2 emissions
229g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325CiAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci6,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V65,600 rpm4,400 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325CiAlfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.2 s
36.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
192 hp
143 kW
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
192 hp
143 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
245 Nm
181 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
234 km/h
145 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
656 km
408 mi
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
737 km
458 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
192 hp
143 kW
8.0 s
234 km/h
145 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
192 hp
143 kW
7.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,488 mm
176.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.0 s
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325CiAlfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
245 Nm
181 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,488 mm
176.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
656 km
408 mi
737 km
458 mi
CO2 score
229 g/km
-
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325CiAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 325Ci
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) · Facelift 2003 325Ci vs Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster