Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6vsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208)

CLK 320 V6

218 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1998-1999
VS

Alfa Romeo Spider (916)

3.0 V6

192 hp2959 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    218 hp
    163 kW
  • Highest torque
    310 Nm
    229 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.7 L/100 km
    15.0 mpg US
    18.0 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    237 L
  • Best overall score
    47/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best practicality score
    43/100

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    737 km
    458 mi
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
218hp163kW
192hp143kW
Torque
310Nm229lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
103.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
91.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
569km353mi
Calculated
737km458mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,199cc195cu in
2,959cc181cu in
Length
4,567mm180in
4,285mm169in
Width
1,722mm68in
1,780mm70in
Height
1,380mm54in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,540mm100in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,499mm59in
Rear track
1,474mm58in
1,497mm59in
Trunk volume
237L
110L
Max trunk volume
350L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
62L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V65,700 rpm3,000-4,600 rpm5,950 rpm
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V65,600 rpm4,400 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
36.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
218 hp
163 kW
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
192 hp
143 kW

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 has 26 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
236 km/h
147 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
569 km
353 mi
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
737 km
458 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
218 hp
163 kW
8.3 s
236 km/h
147 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
192 hp
143 kW
7.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
237 L
8.4 cu ft
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
8.3 s
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
7.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
237 L
8.4 cu ft
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
569 km
353 mi
737 km
458 mi
Trunk score
237 L
8.4 cu ft
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 127 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 vs Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster