Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6vsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk237 L
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 91.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 737km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,497mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 237L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 5,700 rpm | 3,000-4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 has 26 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 7.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 569 km 353 mi |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 737 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 737 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 237 L 8.4 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 | Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 127 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























