BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) · Facelift 2003 325CivsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 97.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.2s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 149Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 656km408mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,494cc152cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.2 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 192 hp 143 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB has 8 hp more than BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 8.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | 192 hp 143 kW | 8.0 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003325Ci | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 656 km 408 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) Facelift 2003 325Ci
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























