Mini Paceman (R61)
Car comparison
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6vsAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013
1.4 TP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,170 kg2,579 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,305kg2,877lb | 1,170kg2,579lb |
| Gross weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.8s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km487mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,114mm162in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,518mm60in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,511mm99in |
| Front track | 1,531mm60in | 1,483mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,475mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.8 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 7.3 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 487 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























