Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Lightest1,215 kg2,679 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful202 hp151 kW
- Highest torque271 Nm200 lb-ft
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 202hp151kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 271Nm200lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,215kg2,679lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 84.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 30.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 737km458mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,335mm171in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,490mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 365L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 30.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB has 10 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.4 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 737 km 458 mi |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 202 hp 151 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 737 km 458 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB | Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 91 Nm more
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























