Car comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsAlfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II)

3.0 V6

207 hp2946 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2005
VS

Alfa Romeo GTV (916)

2.0 V6 TB

202 hp1996 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1995-2003

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    207 hp
    154 kW
  • Highest torque
    285 Nm
    210 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    390 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,370 kg
    3,020 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    737 km
    458 mi
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
207hp154kW
202hp151kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
271Nm200lb-ft
Curb weight
1,485kg3,274lb
1,370kg3,020lb
Gross weight
1,910kg4,211lb
1,820kg4,012lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
99.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
31.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
700km435mi
Calculated
737km458mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
1,996cc122cu in
Length
4,615mm182in
4,285mm169in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,780mm70in
Height
1,352mm53in
1,318mm52in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,540mm100in
Front track
1,511mm59in
1,499mm59in
Rear track
1,525mm60in
1,506mm59in
Trunk volume
390L
110L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
238g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V66,000 rpm3,750 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB6,000 rpm2,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
31.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
202 hp
151 kW

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
271 Nm
200 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
1,370 kg
3,020 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
240 km/h
149 mph
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V67.8 s
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB7.4 s

Although Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
700 km
435 mi
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
737 km
458 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
7.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
202 hp
151 kW
7.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
207 hp
154 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
271 Nm
200 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Range score
700 km
435 mi
737 km
458 mi
CO2 score
238 g/km
-
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 14 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 280 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB

  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
2.0 V6 TB
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.0 V6
330Cd
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd
2.0 V6 TB
328Ci
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci
3.0 V6
1.6 THP
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0 V6 TB
2.5 20V T
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
3.0 V6
1.8 T
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
2.0 V6 TB
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
3.0 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 V6 TB
328i
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
2.0 V6 TB
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 vs Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB - car comparison - FastVsFaster