AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 TvsAlfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo GTV (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk220 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 202hp151kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 737km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,345mm53in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,429mm96in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 220L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 490L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 226g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T has 23 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 6.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 660 km 410 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 737 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 202 hp 151 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 202 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 737 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 226 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 9 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























