Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDMvsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,429 km888 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,421kg3,133lb |
| Gross weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 93.7s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.6s Calculated | 94.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,429km888mi Calculated | 1,196km743mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,956cc119cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,351mm171in | 4,278mm168in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,486mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,634mm104in | 2,537mm100in |
| Front track | 1,554mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,554mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.6 s | 94.0 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 1,421 kg 3,133 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 202 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,429 km 888 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 1,196 km 743 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,421 kg 3,133 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,429 km 888 mi | 1,196 km 743 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























