AUDI A3 (8V)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
2.0 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,429 km888 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score73/100
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 90.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.1s Calculated | 55.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,429km888mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,956cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,237mm167in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,601mm102in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,554mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 110g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.1 s | 55.6 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM and AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,429 km 888 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,429 km 888 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 110 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 258 km (161 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























