Car comparison

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3vsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016

2.0 T3

152 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016

2.0 JTDM

150 hp1956 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM

  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,320 kg
    2,910 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    105 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
Power
152hp113kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,479kg3,261lb
1,320kg2,910lb
Gross weight
1,965kg4,332lb
-
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
52.8s
Calculated
54.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,127km700mi
Calculated
1,500km932mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,956cc119cu in
Length
4,369mm172in
4,351mm171in
Width
1,783mm70in
1,798mm71in
Height
1,439mm57in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,647mm104in
2,364mm93in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,554mm61in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,554mm61in
Ground clearance
144mm6in
-
Trunk volume
324L
-
Max trunk volume
1,500L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
60L
CO2 emissions
129g/km
105g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDMPowerTorque
  • Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T35,000 rpm1,700-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.8 s
54.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
150 hp
112 kW

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 has 2 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
1,479 kg
3,261 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
1,320 kg
2,910 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
210 km/h
130 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T38.3 s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
1,127 km
700 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
1,500 km
932 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW
8.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
324 L
11.4 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.3 s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
Power
152 hp
113 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,479 kg
3,261 lb
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
324 L
11.4 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
1,127 km
700 mi
1,500 km
932 mi
CO2 score
129 g/km
105 g/km
Trunk score
324 L
11.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km7.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi11.27 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal600 L159 US gal132 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,050 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 159 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 373 km (232 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 24 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V40 2.0 T3
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsVolvoV402.0 D4
2.0 JTDM
2.0 JTDM
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM
2.0 T3
2.0 T3
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3
2.0 JTDM
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 T3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4
2.0 JTDM
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
2.0 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 JTDM
1.4 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDMvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI
2.0 T3
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 T3
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
2.0 JTDM
2.0 D3
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDMvsVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
2.0 T3
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3vsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM - car comparison - FastVsFaster