Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016
2.0 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 46.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,956cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 46.4 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 170 hp 127 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.3 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























