Car comparison

Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013 1.4 TPvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013

1.4 TP

170 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2013-2016
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016

2.0 JTD

170 hp1956 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Lightest
    1,170 kg
    2,579 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    124 g/km
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD

  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,154 km
    717 mi
  • Largest trunk
    350 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TPAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
Power
170hp127kW
170hp127kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,170kg2,579lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight-
1,920kg4,233lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
85.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
35.4s
Calculated
46.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
1,154km717mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,368cc83cu in
1,956cc119cu in
Length
4,063mm160in
4,351mm171in
Width
1,720mm68in
1,798mm71in
Height
1,446mm57in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,511mm99in
2,634mm104in
Front track
1,483mm58in
1,554mm61in
Rear track
1,475mm58in
1,554mm61in
Trunk volume
270L
350L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
45L
60L
CO2 emissions
124g/km
136g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TPAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TPAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.4 s
46.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
1,170 kg
2,579 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
219 km/h
136 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
170 hp
127 kW
7.3 s
219 km/h
136 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
170 hp
127 kW
8.3 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TPAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTD
Power
170 hp
127 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,170 kg
2,579 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
1,154 km
717 mi
CO2 score
124 g/km
136 g/km
Trunk score
270 L
9.5 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TPAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP

  • Is 240 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 321 km (199 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TP
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013 1.4 TP vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTD - car comparison - FastVsFaster