Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.5 T5vsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
1.750 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight178 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.5 T5 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,574kg3,470lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 178hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,420mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 5,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.5 T5 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo V40 2.5 T5 has 19 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi and Volvo V40 2.5 T5: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 2.5 T5 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 785 km 488 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 235 hp 175 kW | 6.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.5 T5 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.5 T5 | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Is 254 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























