Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016
1.750 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,932kg4,259lb | - |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.1s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,449mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,364mm93in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 5,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 781 km 485 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.0 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























