Hyundai i30 III
Car comparison
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016
1.750 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
- Largest trunk395 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,335mm171in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,451mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,364mm93in |
| Front track | - | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 395L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,301L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 5,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi and Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 6.0 s |
Although Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi and Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.0 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.750 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.750 TBi
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























