Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F55)

Cooper SD 2.0

170 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016

1.4 TB MultiAir

170 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,250 kg
    2,756 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170hp127kW
170hp127kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,250kg2,756lb
1,305kg2,877lb
Gross weight
1,775kg3,913lb
-
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
75.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
79.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
33.6s
Calculated
39.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,048km651mi
Calculated
1,224km761mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,368cc83cu in
Length
4,005mm158in
4,351mm171in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,798mm71in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,364mm93in
Front track
1,501mm59in
1,554mm61in
Rear track
1,501mm59in
1,554mm61in
Ground clearance
146mm6in
-
Trunk volume
278L
-
Max trunk volume
941L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
44L
60L
CO2 emissions
109g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirPowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.6 s
39.2 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,305 kg
2,877 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
223 km/h
139 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.07.3 s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
1,048 km
651 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,224 km
761 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
7.3 s
223 km/h
139 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW
7.7 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
1,305 kg
2,877 lb
Fuel consumption
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
1,048 km
651 mi
1,224 km
761 mi
CO2 score
109 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
278 L
9.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
Consumption4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.35 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.83 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used630 L166 US gal139 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,103 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.4 MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAbarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAbarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir - car comparison - FastVsFaster