Mini Hatch (R56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6vsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,165 kg2,568 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,165kg2,568lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 75.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 33.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,729mm147in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,407mm55in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 941L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 33.6 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 has 14 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,048 km 651 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 1,048 km 651 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 118 L more trunk volume
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























