Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Veloce 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range940 km584 mi
- Best performance score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,565kg3,450lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 940km584mi Calculated | 906km563mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 415L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 5.2 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 940 km 584 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 906 km 563 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 940 km 584 mi | 906 km 563 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























