Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo · Stage 3vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo · Stage 2vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo · Stage 1vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed359 km/h223 mph
- Most powerful765 hp570 kW
- Highest torque930 Nm686 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight472 hp/t352 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best estimated range630 km392 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 765hp570kW+255 hp | 663hp494kW+153 hp | 602hp449kW+92 hp | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 930Nm686lb-ft+330 Nm | 810Nm597lb-ft+210 Nm | 732Nm540lb-ft+132 Nm | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 344 km/h 214 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.4s99% target: 355 km/h / 221 mph-4.8 s Calculated | 35.8s99% target: 341 km/h / 212 mph-3.3 s Calculated | 37.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 39.1s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s-0.9 s | 3.3s-0.6 s | 3.5s-0.4 s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.0s-2.8 s Calculated | 7.8s-2.0 s Calculated | 8.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 9.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s-0.8 s Calculated | 3.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.4s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s-1.4 s Calculated | 10.5s-0.9 s Calculated | 10.8s-0.6 s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 472hp/t352kW/t214hp/1000 lb Calculated | 409hp/t305kW/t186hp/1000 lb Calculated | 371hp/t277kW/t169hp/1000 lb Calculated | 315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 574Nm/t384lb-ft/ton Calculated | 500Nm/t335lb-ft/ton Calculated | 452Nm/t302lb-ft/ton Calculated | 370Nm/t248lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km392mi Calculated | 630km392mi Calculated | 630km392mi Calculated | 630km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | 2,891cc176cu in | 2,891cc176cu in | 2,891cc176cu in |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | 4,639mm183in | 4,639mm183in | 4,639mm183in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,874mm74in | 1,874mm74in | 1,874mm74in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,433mm56in | 1,433mm56in | 1,433mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,609mm63in | 1,609mm63in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 480L | 480L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L | 58L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | 214g/km | 214g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2) 663 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1) 602 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo 510 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 3.2 s | 3.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | 8.4 s | 9.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.9 s | 22.3 s | 26.8 s | - |
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 344 km/h 214 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s | 10.8 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 251 km/h 156 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 765 hp 570 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 663 hp 494 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 602 hp 449 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 510 hp 380 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp has 255 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo 510 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo 510 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp: 255 hp (190 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 930 Nm 686 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 732 Nm 540 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 359 km/h 223 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 344 km/h 214 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 307 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo 510 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2) 663 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1) 602 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 472 hp/t 352 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 371 hp/t 277 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 630 km 392 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 630 km 392 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 630 km 392 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 630 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 765 hp 570 kW | 3.0 s | 359 km/h 223 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 663 hp 494 kW | 3.3 s | 344 km/h 214 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 602 hp 449 kW | 3.5 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | 472 hp/t 352 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | 371 hp/t 277 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3)765 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2)663 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1)602 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo510 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 765 hp 570 kW | 663 hp 494 kW | 602 hp 449 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 930 Nm 686 lb-ft | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft | 732 Nm 540 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 344 km/h 214 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 392 mi | 630 km 392 mi | 630 km 392 mi | 630 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | 214 g/km | 214 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 472 hp/t 352 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 371 hp/t 277 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2) 663 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 1) 602 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo 510 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 3) 765 hp
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo (Stage 2) 663 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























