Bentley Flying Spur III
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
GTA 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range776 km482 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 540hp403kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 36.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.0s Calculated | 8.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 776km482mi Calculated | 496km308mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,891cc176cu in |
| Length | 5,316mm209in | 4,654mm183in |
| Width | 2,013mm79in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,194mm126in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,654mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 271g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.0 s | 8.9 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 226 km/h 141 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 540 hp 403 kW |
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 3.6 s |
Although Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 776 km 482 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 496 km 308 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 540 hp 403 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 540 hp 403 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 776 km 482 mi | 496 km 308 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 271 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6
- Is 725 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 100 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























