Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6vsTesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful540 hp403 kW
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score75/100
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 540hp403kW | 513hp383kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,856kg4,092lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,305kg5,082lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 28.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.9s Calculated | 9.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 496km308mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | - |
| Length | 4,654mm183in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 271g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 11.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 226 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 540 hp 403 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 has 27 hp more than Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 3.6 s |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 has more power, Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | 540 hp 403 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW | 3.4 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)GTA 2.9 V6 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 540 hp 403 kW | 513 hp 383 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 496 km 308 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 271 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) GTA 2.9 V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Has 54 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























