Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Best estimated range1,143 km710 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,040km646mi Calculated | 1,143km710mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,641mm65in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 7.1 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,040 km 646 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,143 km 710 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,040 km 646 mi | 1,143 km 710 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























