Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 20dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 MultiJet

160 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    109 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    131 g/km
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Best estimated range
    1,179 km
    732 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)20dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
180hp134kW
160hp119kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,696kg3,739lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,340kg5,159lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
76.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
36.3s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,179km732mi
Calculated
1,040km646mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,438mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,571mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,641mm65in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume-
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
52L
CO2 emissions
148g/km
131g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 20dAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)20dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.3 s
35.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
160 hp
119 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 20d has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d8.5 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet8.2 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 20d has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)20d
1,179 km
732 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
1,040 km
646 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
160 hp
119 kW
8.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)20d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.5 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)20d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)20dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
180 hp
134 kW
160 hp
119 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Range score
1,179 km
732 mi
1,040 km
646 mi
CO2 score
148 g/km
131 g/km
Trunk score
-
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 20dAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 20d

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 231 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 17 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 MultiJet
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
20d
20d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.2 MultiJet
C 200d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 MultiJet
35 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI
20d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.2 MultiJet
E 200d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d
20d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.2 MultiJet
1.3 TCe
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsRenaultTalisman1.3 TCe
20d
D180
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
2.2 MultiJet
A 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet - car comparison - FastVsFaster