Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetvsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 MultiJet

210 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022
VS

Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022

2.0TD T4 Evo

218 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    945 km
    587 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
210hp157kW
218hp163kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,155kg4,751lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
62.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
56.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
24.7s
Calculated
32.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
945km587mi
Calculated
847km527mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,650mm183in
4,684mm184in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,556mm61in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
480L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
52L
50L
CO2 emissions
145g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetLynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 EvoPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet3,500 rpm1,750 rpm3,750 rpm
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo5,000 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.7 s
32.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
210 hp
157 kW
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has 8 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
235 km/h
146 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet6.8 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo7.2 s

Although Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
945 km
587 mi
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
847 km
527 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
210 hp
157 kW
6.8 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.8 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
210 hp
157 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
945 km
587 mi
847 km
527 mi
CO2 score
145 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetLynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet

  • Has 145 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 66 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD T4 Evo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 MultiJet
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.2 MultiJet
A 220
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 MultiJet
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0TD T4 Evo
380TSI
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
2.2 MultiJet
C 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
2.0TD T4 Evo
A 250
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 250
2.2 MultiJet
C 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 MultiJet
40 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)40 TDI
2.0TD T4 Evo
320d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
2.2 MultiJet
40 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJetvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201640 TFSI
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet vs Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo - car comparison - FastVsFaster