Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 JTD

150 hp2143 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T3

152 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,374 kg
    3,029 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    109 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,238 km
    769 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
150hp112kW
152hp113kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,374kg3,029lb
1,534kg3,382lb
Gross weight-
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,238km769mi
Calculated
1,205km749mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
480L
380L
Max trunk volume-
1,749L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
52L
68L
CO2 emissions
109g/km
131g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T35,000 rpm1,300-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
37.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
150 hp
112 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 has 2 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,374 kg
3,029 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
1,534 kg
3,382 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD8.4 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T38.6 s

Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,238 km
769 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
1,205 km
749 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
152 hp
113 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,374 kg
3,029 lb
1,534 kg
3,382 lb
Fuel consumption
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,238 km
769 mi
1,205 km
749 mi
CO2 score
109 g/km
131 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
Consumption4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.35 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.83 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used630 L166 US gal139 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,103 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 JTD
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 T3
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 T3
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 T3
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS902.0 T4
2.2 JTD
C 180
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
2.2 JTD
1.4 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.2 JTD
1.4 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI
2.0 T3
2.0 TDCi
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi
2.2 JTD
1.5 T3
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
2.2 JTD
C 200d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster