Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022 2.0 TurbovsTesla Model 3 Highland · Facelift 2023 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 Highland · Facelift 2023
60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score85/100
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Largest trunk594 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 283hp211kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,149kg4,738lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,584mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 594L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 283 hp 211 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh has 3 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5.2 s |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 6.1 s |
Although Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 594 L 21.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 60 kWh
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























