Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range796 km494 mi
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 796km494mi Calculated | 716km445mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | - | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5.2 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 796 km 494 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 716 km 445 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 796 km 494 mi | 716 km 445 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Is 199 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 21 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























