Alfa Romeo Brera
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTSvsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,437 kg3,168 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions208 g/km
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,437kg3,168lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 86.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 579km359mi Calculated | 713km443mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,413mm174in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,525mm99in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 284g/km | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 260 hp 194 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS has 40 hp more than Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 7.0 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 6.7 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS has more power, Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 579 km 359 mi |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 713 km 443 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 579 km 359 mi | 713 km 443 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 284 g/km | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 2 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Is 283 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 76 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























