Volvo C30
Car comparison
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5vsAlfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
1.8 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions189 g/km
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,437kg3,168lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 689km428mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,252mm167in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has 30 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 689 km 428 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Is 7 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























