Alfa Romeo 8C Spider
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8vsAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.5 TFSI plus
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions212 g/km
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 557km346mi Calculated | 659km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,381mm172in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,892mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,366mm54in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,645mm104in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 377g/km | 212g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 5,500-6,700 rpm | 1,650-5,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW |
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 has 90 hp more than AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 280 km/h 174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 4.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 6.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 557 km 346 mi |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 659 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.4 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 280 km/h 174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 557 km 346 mi | 659 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 377 g/km | 212 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.65 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,148 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Uses 6.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 102 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 165 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























