Alfa Romeo 8C Spider
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8vsAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J)
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions221 g/km
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 557km346mi Calculated | 632km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,381mm172in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,892mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,366mm54in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,645mm104in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 377g/km | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 179 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 has 110 hp more than AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 557 km 346 mi |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 632 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 557 km 346 mi | 632 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 377 g/km | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.65 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,148 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 156 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























