Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7vsChevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider

1.7

240 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible2015-2019
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    257 km/h
    160 mph
  • Lightest
    940 kg
    2,072 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    255 hp/t
    190 kW/t
    3.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.1 L/100 km
    23.3 mpg US
    28.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo4C Spider1.7ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Power
240hp179kW
275hp205kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
940kg2,072lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
90.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
15.3s
Calculated
24.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
580km360mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,742cc106cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
3,989mm157in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,897mm75in
Height
1,183mm47in
1,344mm53in
Wheelbase
2,380mm94in
2,811mm111in
Front track
1,639mm65in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,617mm64in
Ground clearance
113mm4in
-
Trunk volume
110L
206L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
40L
72L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
184g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.76,000 rpm2,200-4,250 rpm6,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo4C Spider1.7ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.3 s
24.9 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
114 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
240 hp
179 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
275 hp
205 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0 has 35 hp more than Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
940 kg
2,072 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.74.5 s
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.06.1 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0 has more power, Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
580 km
360 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
240 hp
179 kW
4.5 s
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
275 hp
205 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
3,989 mm
157.0 in
Height
1,183 mm
46.6 in
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,344 mm
52.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
4.5 s
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo4C Spider1.7ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
6.1 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
940 kg
2,072 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
3,989 mm
157.0 in
Height
1,183 mm
46.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,344 mm
52.9 in
Range score
580 km
360 mi
889 km
552 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
184 g/km
Trunk score
110 L
3.9 cu ft
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7

  • Is 719 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 96 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.7
1.7
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsAlfa Romeo4C1.7
2.0
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
1.7
JCW 2.0
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsMiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1.7
230i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsBMW2 Series Convertible (F23)230i
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1.7
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsAUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
1.7
430i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsBMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i
1.7
2.0
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsPorsche718 Boxster (982)2.0
1.7
430i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7vsBMW4 Series Convertible (F33)Facelift 2017430i
2.0
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20172.0
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster