Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7vsMini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F57)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest940 kg2,072 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score67/100
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 940kg2,072lb | 1,235kg2,723lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 580km360mi Calculated | 677km421mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,989mm157in | 3,874mm153in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,183mm47in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,380mm94in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,639mm65in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 113mm4in | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 has 9 hp more than Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 and Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 4.5 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 580 km 360 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 677 km 421 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW | 4.5 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 940 kg 2,072 lb | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 580 km 360 mi | 677 km 421 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 | Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























