AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 4C Spider
1.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions145 g/km
- Best estimated range844 km524 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Lightest940 kg2,072 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 940kg2,072lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 844km524mi Calculated | 580km360mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 3,989mm157in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,183mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,380mm94in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,639mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 113mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.7 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW |
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 6.7 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 4.5 s |
Although AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI has more power, Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 844 km 524 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 580 km 360 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW | 4.5 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 940 kg 2,072 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 844 km 524 mi | 580 km 360 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
- Is 710 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























