Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 · Stage 3vsAlfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 · Stage 2vsAlfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 · Stage 1vsAlfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 4C Spider
1.7 (Stage 2)
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
1.7 (Stage 1)
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
1.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed298 km/h185 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest940 kg2,072 lb
- Best power-to-weight383 hp/t286 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range580 km360 mi
- Largest trunk110 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score27/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW+120 hp | 312hp233kW+72 hp | 283hp211kW+43 hp | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 940kg2,072lb | 940kg2,072lb | 940kg2,072lb | 940kg2,072lb |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 41.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph-10.5 s Calculated | 45.8s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph-6.4 s Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph-3.6 s Calculated | 52.2s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s-1.0 s | 3.8s-0.7 s | 4.1s-0.4 s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.7s-5.6 s Calculated | 11.3s-4.0 s Calculated | 12.6s-2.8 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.9s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s-1.5 s Calculated | 11.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 383hp/t286kW/t174hp/1000 lb Calculated | 332hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 577Nm/t386lb-ft/ton Calculated | 503Nm/t336lb-ft/ton Calculated | 454Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 580km360mi Calculated | 580km360mi Calculated | 580km360mi Calculated | 580km360mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in |
| Front track | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 113mm4in | 113mm4in | 113mm4in | 113mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 110L | 110L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L | 40L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 161g/km | 161g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 240 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.7 s | 11.3 s | 12.6 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp has 120 hp more than Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 240 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 240 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp: 120 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 940 kg 2,072 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 3.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 3.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 4.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 240 hp: 1.0 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 383 hp/t 286 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 301 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 580 km 360 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 580 km 360 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 580 km 360 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 580 km 360 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW | 3.5 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW | 3.8 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW | 4.1 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 4.5 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 383 hp/t 286 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 301 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C Spider1.7240 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 312 hp 233 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 940 kg 2,072 lb | 940 kg 2,072 lb | 940 kg 2,072 lb | 940 kg 2,072 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 580 km 360 mi | 580 km 360 mi | 580 km 360 mi | 580 km 360 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 161 g/km | 161 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 383 hp/t 286 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























