Car comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8S)

2.0 TFSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2014-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo 4C

1.7

240 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    833 km
    518 mi
  • Largest trunk
    305 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    895 kg
    1,973 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    268 hp/t
    200 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIAlfa Romeo4C1.7
Power
230hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,335kg2,943lb
895kg1,973lb
Gross weight
1,735kg3,825lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
258 km/h
160 mph
To 99% top speed
70.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
52.1s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
19.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
588km366mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,742cc106cu in
Length
4,177mm164in
3,989mm157in
Width
1,832mm72in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,353mm53in
1,183mm47in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
2,380mm94in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,639mm65in
Rear track
1,552mm61in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance-
114mm4in
Trunk volume
305L
110L
Max trunk volume
712L
-
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
55L
40L
CO2 emissions
153g/km
157g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSIAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7PowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,450 rpm
Alfa Romeo4C1.76,000 rpm2,200-4,250 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIAlfa Romeo4C1.7
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.0 s
15.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
258 km/h
160 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
172 km/h
107 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
240 hp
179 kW

Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 has 10 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
895 kg
1,973 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
258 km/h
160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI5.3 s
Alfa Romeo4C1.74.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 and AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
833 km
518 mi
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
588 km
366 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
240 hp
179 kW
4.5 s
258 km/h
160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
305 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,177 mm
164.4 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
3,989 mm
157.0 in
Height
1,183 mm
46.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
5.3 s
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo4C1.7
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIAlfa Romeo4C1.7
Power
230 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
258 km/h
160 mph
Lightness
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
895 kg
1,973 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
305 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,177 mm
164.4 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
3,989 mm
157.0 in
Height
1,183 mm
46.6 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
588 km
366 mi
CO2 score
153 g/km
157 g/km
Trunk score
305 L
10.8 cu ft
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSIAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 245 km (152 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 195 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 440 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
1.7
1.7
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAlfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.7
428i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)428i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.7
228i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)228i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
1.7
3.2 JTS V6
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
2.0 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1.7
428i
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)428i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.7
C 300
VS
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TFSI vs Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 - car comparison - FastVsFaster